When Structure Pays
An agent system can spend extra computation in two ways: generate several candidates and choose among them, or add a parent process that delegates to workers. These articles compare both choices against a simpler one-agent baseline.
For teams choosing an agent design, the series shows when a shared checker makes extra samples useful, when coordination adds cost without a measured gain, and what another experiment must record before the result can generalize.
Start here: When Does Best-of-Five Sampling Pay for AI Code Generation?. Start with best-of-five sampling, where every candidate faces the same deterministic check. Then examine a paired supervisor-versus-solo replay that records quality, tokens, elapsed time, missing data, and uncertainty.
When Does Best-of-Five Sampling Pay for AI Code Generation?
Best-of-five sampling improves AI code generation when every candidate faces the same deterministic check; learn the measured lift, cost, limits, and rule.
Supervisor vs. Solo AI Agents: Measure Coordination Cost
A paired replay found solo 7/10 versus supervisor 4/10, p=.25, with 2.55× tokens and 2.42× wall time; learn the result's limits and fair test.